Knowledge Isn’t Power??


Paul Krugman, courtesy of the New York Times

Economist Paul Krugman points out a very, very inconvenient truth that explains some of the disturbing events we see around the world today (New York Times: Knowledge Isn’t Power). Many influential thinkers and policy makers expediently explain away the rising economic inequality by attributing it to a growing skills gap and individuals’ lack of access to or desire for education. But Krugman points out that  the biggest economic gains have all gone to a tiny group of individuals “holding strategic positions in corporate suites or astride the crossroads of finance” and not at all distributed proportionally according to possession of college degrees. In spite of the claims of Wall Street that the push for governance and regulation have gone overboard, the inordinate distribution of economic power presents a case for more effective oversight by governments.

It is stark inequality that explains recent phenomenon such as the Occupy Wall Street movement. I will even argue that it is stark inequality that explains why we see hundreds of young disaffected Westerners beguiled into turning into Jihadists.

Disappointing record of corporate governance

The Philippines too suffers from great inequality. The billionaires in the Forbes List of the 50 Richest  Filipinos have the burden of proving that they are not too short-sighted not to ensure the balance among the economic health of its workers and contractors, the protection customers and the robustness of corporate dividends. We are painfully aware of unfair practices in the past that – in the end – stunted the growth of the economy as a whole. In the face of  intractable poverty, it is perhaps only the patient,  peaceful,  and amiable character of Filipinos generally that has prevented a violent backlash  that we are seeing in some of the emerging economies today.

Krugman is correct in saying that education – by itself –  will not cut it. Nevertheless I still believe that for 99% of us, education is still the first step on the way up. In the long-run, education should lead to middle class growth that will one day form an irresistible consumer base and a key political power bloc. Except that as astute economists like Krugman wryly tell us, in the long-run we will also be all dead.

A short blog post will not do justice to this topic so let me just focus on business education for purposes of the rest of this post.

A case for entrepreneurship

In the Philippine context, business education should focus a lot more on entrepreneurship moving forward. In an inescapably globalizing world, either we engage the Wall Street behemoths and learn how to succeed within their glistening corridors or we create alternatives by building grassroots businesses that generate employment. The former is what many like myself and tens of thousands of other professionals are starting to learn through our local business schools. The college and MBA degrees have led to jobs – lots if it – but have failed to contribute to the redistribution of economic power. We don’t nurture enough entrepreneurs the same way that China or India or even Singapore does.

The Philippines is a one-trick pony in this respect.

One trick pony

Photo credit: Northern Rivers Echo


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s